Page 19 - Standard Indicators for the social appropriation of science
P. 19

Scale


        The  selection  of  the  scale  can  have  a  wide     disbelieve,  disbelieve,  neither  believe  nor
        influence  in  the  results  obtained  from  a         disbelieve, believe, strongly believe).
        questionnaire.
                                                               • The answers are not expressed numerically
        Given  that  the  standardisation  of  responses       (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) but verbally so that all respondents
        in the  questionnaire  largely eliminates the          can understand them as unambiguously and
        possibility  of  recording  specific  and  original    equally as possible and then so that they can
        answers  of  individuals  from  the  surveyed          choose the one that is closest to them and with
        population, it is desirable, on the other hand,        which they can best identify.
        that respondents be offered adequate options           •  Verbal  variants  of  the  answers  (and  not
        that are as close to them as possible. And even        numerical ones) can also be clearly interpreted
        though these options may  be general, they             in the research results.
        still correspond to their situation, opinions,         •  They  are  easier  for  respondents  to  move
        attitudes or evaluations.                              through  the questionnaire,  and  they are  not
                                                               confused  with  several  scales  with  different
        In our case, the 5-point Likert  scale  was            number of degrees.
        therefore  very  suitable  for  recording  the         •  Visually, the questionnaire is clearer  and
        knowledge,  perception, beliefs and trust  of          more friendly to fill out.
        respondents analogously used in all 4 topics           •  Use of the same pattern of scale answers
        in our research: climate change, vaccination,          also has other advantages in more advanced
        GMOs,      complementary       and    alternative      statistical processing  –e.g., when creating
        medicine.                                              variation of change of responses, creation of
                                                               indexes, or in cluster analysis.
        The main reasons for applying this scale were:
                                                               The PERSIST_EU project went beyond

        • To offer a continuum of answers from minimum         the  development  of  the  ICT  tool  to  assess
        to  maximum.  2  negative  degrees  +  middle          knowledge,  beliefs  and  perceptions  and
        variant + 2 positive degrees (for example: very        designed  an  activity  to  validate  this  platform
        low, low, moderate, high, very high / strongly         and to determine the changes resulting after
                                                               participating  in  this  activity,  called  Science
                                                               Camp (SC).






























                                                                                                            19
                                                                                                 Persist_EU
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24