Page 9 - Standard Indicators for the social appropriation of science
P. 9

Cosmovision and worldviews of the
                                    university European students





        worldview and the construction of the scales of         and  morality,  which  help  to  advance  how
        values that people construct to relate socially,        science  is  evaluated,  in  a  period  in  which
        the British anthropologist  Mary Douglas                science is more accessible to  all audiences
        conceptualised  through  her work  Natural              than in previous generations.  Therefore, there
                                                                                              3
        Symbols: Explorations  in Cosmology  the                is considerable scope for future research, as
                                                   1
        fundamental models of individual thought and            pointed out by Sbaffi & Rowley.  These authors
                                                                                                4
        behaviour in different contemporary societies.          detail the importance of sociodemographic
        With the PERSIST_EU project  (Knowledge,                variables focused on improving understanding,
        beliefs,   Perceptions     about    Science    of       trust,  and health information judgments.
        European  Students), we wanted to identify if           Recently, Sammut & Bauer  explained  in a
                                                                                              5
        the  level  of  confidence,  perception,  attitude      study  that  all  the  influences  individuals  have
        and, ultimately, the cosmovision of European            could be described  through a systematic
        university  students  on  science  issues,  would       overview  of  the  different  modalities  of  social
        change after participating in training activities       influence,  including  crowding,  leadership,
        (Science camps) or, on the contrary,  they              conformity, obedience, persuasion, the media
        would remain unchanged.  Therefore, we                  and artefacts. Sammut & Bauer have called it
        wanted to know if training would be a key               the ‘cyclone’ model of social influence, which
        element that would  allow  changing  the scale          would  regulate  society’s  historical  evolution
        of values on the European university student            through  normalisation,  maintenance,  and  the
        body’s science issues. The sociodemographic             challenge of common sense.
        profiles of those who have proactive or passive
        attitudes towards science  knowledge  and,              The PERSIST_EU project’s philosophy  is to
        above all, people who are in favour or against          determine  the  attitude  and  point  of  view  that
        certain  science  advances  have  been  widely          European  students  have  on  science  topics,
        studied over the last decades.  2                       which could be socially controversial, such as
                                                                vaccines, climate change, genetically modified
        Likewise, the  perception of  science has also          organisms, or complementary and alternative
        been studied from a belief system that shares           medicines. Other topics such as gene editing,
        motivational  functions  with  religious  and           organ  transplants, nuclear  energy, fracking,
        political  ideologies,  but  also  with  motivation     radiation, etc., were also being considered for





        1. Douglas, M. (2004). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. Routledge.
        2. a) Bauer, M., Durant, J., & Evans, G. (1994). European public perceptions of science. International Journal of
        Public Opinion Research, 6(2), 163-186; b) Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A
        review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079; c) George,
        R. (2006). A cross-domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of
        science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 571-589; d) Rubin, A., Pellegrini, G., & Šottník, L. (2020).
        Role of Science Communication in beliefs, perceptions and knowledge of science and technology issues among
        European citizens. In EGU General Assembly 2020. Online, 4-8 May 2020, EGU2020–2943.
        3. Rutjens, B. T., Heine, S. J., Sutton, R. M., & van Harreveld, F. (2018). Attitudes towards science. In Advances in
        Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 125-165.
        4. Sbaffi, L., & Rowley, J. (2017). Trust and credibility in web-based health information: a review and agenda for future
        research. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), e218.
        5. Sammut, G., & Bauer, M. W. (2021). The Psychology of Social Influence: Modes and Modalities of Shifting Common
        Sense. Cambridge University Press.





                                                                                                             9
                                                                                                 Persist_EU
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14